|
Vol
15, Issue 44
|
 |
October 29, 2001
|
Forecasts
By Max Baron
We keep reading in newspaper business sections, sometimes
even on page one, gloom and doom forecasts by presidents and
CEOs of semiconductor and OEM companies. We get the same message
when we turn to TV for hope. And business and technical analysts
reflect the same position. To me, their method of forecasting seems
to use the slide-rule approachnot the one used to do
math, but the one that slides recovery into the future in
increments of years and half-years.
Many experts look upon the recent tragic events as more
reasons to push improved-revenue forecasts further into the
future. Their pessimistic starting point uses data that shows
reduced sales and expectations for corporate and consumer
products that are either already out on the shelf or in process
of being developed and delivered to market. There seems to
be an unstated premise that we should evaluate the future
of the electronics business by predicting when "things are
going to return to normal" and when life will continue as
it did before.
But will life as we used to know it really reboot and return
to its previous status? What will the industry do in the meantime?
Should the industry, as some pundits suggest, try to survive
by holding on to its key employees, spending as little as
possible and hibernating until the warm sun of spring comes
out?
I don't think so. I think the successful CEOs will look
at the short-term scenario and its probable effect on the
future. They will respond to the immediate need to help our
countrya need that may turn into an opportunity to create
new business directions or retarget products that, before
September 11, 2001, were considered dormant.
A few examples may be in order. Security has become the
"product of the hour," creating interest in biometrics, surveillance,
smart cards, DNA identifiers, and many other devices that
can help decrease potential threats to human life. Previously,
security products were aimed at preventing theft of money,
goods, and ideasan important market but, volumewise,
unimpressive. Recent events, however, have promoted this type
of product to the importance level of health services and
beyond. Security products need to run their application programs
on desktops and other types of computing systems. Transceivers,
digital video, audio, and still-imaging hardware are used
in many of these applications. Servers are required to maintain
authorization databases and to store accumulated status history.
Recent reductions in travel have reawakened interest in
video conferencing and group collaboration over the Internet.
Communications hardware and softwaredistance learning,
audio-video streaming, shared whiteboard technologies, and
othersthat were left dormant for quite a while may now
come into their own. The importance of quality-of-service
(QoS) and virtual private networks (VPN) will escalate, as
QoS and VPN provide quality and confidentiality of communication
over the Internet. The distance-collaboration group of products
requires desktop computers, servers, whiteboard digitizers,
Internet connectivity hardware, video cameras, and real-time
streaming services; use of these products will increase the
need for more bandwidth in corporate networks.
The scare of dangerous envelopes in the mail will encourage
increased use of email and facsimile, enlarging storage requirements
at the office and creating penetration of more homes than
before. Sales of computing platforms, inexpensive email terminals,
printers, fax machines, and Internet connectivity may increase.
The sudden rise of companies in videoconferencing, DNA recognition,
and security has occurred because people needed and purchased
existing equipment quickly. The need will not soon disappear.
New devices with more sophisticated specifications, and others
with lower prices, will be welcome, as long as they are delivered
in a timely fashion.
We must underscore the important difference between peacetime
markets and the type of market we are seeing now. Until a
few months ago, product introduction, customer acceptance,
and volume sales followed a slow pattern. Many OEM designers
budgeted for about 10–15 months of development and debug.
The follow-on steps of productization, advertising, fabrication,
and sales may have brought the total time from design start
to solid revenue to about three years.
Recent events have changed the scenario: a sudden market
has been created by new circumstances rather than by the introduction
of new toys. People have new problems and require immediate
solutions; they will respond quickly to their introduction.
OEMs must now react in months instead of years. New products
must be designed and tested quickly, a requirement that favors
use of general-purpose and DSP computing platforms, FPGAs,
and appropriate ASSPs. Existing productssuch as desktops,
servers, and camerasmust be retargeted into quick solutions
to new problems. Microprocessors, DSPs, microcontrollers,
FPGAs, and other complex semiconductor devices will be needed.
The new business scenario has not replaced the old one but
superimposes on it a component the industry can and should
act upon. There is a need for quick-turnaround solutions that
solve and anticipate problems, that may even sacrifice low
price for rapid time to market. And instead of complaining,
some companies may want to leave the hibernation mode and
investigate the current landscape.
|