|
Embedded
Processor Watch
MicroDesign
Resources --- September 28, 2001
Editor: Cary D. Snyder
Contributors
to this issue: Max Baron, Markus Levy, and Cary Snyder
In This
Issue:
- Editorial:
Waiting for The App
- NEC
Processor Goes Out of Order
- Ripping
Good Audio Optimization
- Narrowed
I/O Options Part II
- MIPS
Processor Hits 1GHz
Of Interest:
- Microprocessor
Forum 2001 - News Update
Editorial:
Waiting for The App
By Max Baron {9/24/01-02}
A few
days ago, Intel broke through the 2GHz barrier-a historic
achievement, because of both the frequency itself and the
availability of chips in volume quantities. Really good athletes
make difficult feats look easy. And it did look easy when,
one more time, at San Jose's Fairmont Hotel, with red lights
reflecting off huge balloons, Intel told the press it had
achieved its goal. The professional presentation and the quick
demos made it all look very easy. Automotive design applications
and music ripping followed medical applications. Rapid creation
of videos was demonstrated: montages of background, images,
and sound became a real show. You walk out in awe, thinking
of the hundreds of man-years that went into this, confident
that there are more "gigahertzes" where these came
from-and then you remember the killer app.
The
killer app, as it was expectantly dubbed a few years ago,
was supposed to be a program that required top performance
(and memory) and kept coming back for more. Its appeal was
to be so great that it would trigger mass desktop purchases
by people who had never before used a computer. Additionally,
this app would make existing computer owners run to the nearest
store to buy a new, more powerful computer. It would bring
revenue growth and comfortable margins back to semiconductor
and system vendors alike.
An application
has arrived, but it's not a program. Instead of channeling
more revenue into the PC area, it's taking the money unto
itself. I'm talking about the Internet. Internet connectivity
has become a sink of money or a source of major revenue, depending
on which side of the cash register you occupy. It has also
become a sink of time.
High-speed
connectivity has become more important than high-speed local
processing in a desktop. Web sites use high-quality animation
to differentiate themselves from each other; audio and video
bandwidth requirements compete with downloads of ever-increasing
file sizes. Depending on a subscriber's being inside the magic
mile or outside it, the charge for ADSL can run from approximately
$40 per month to $80. Add about $20 per month if, for professional
reasons, the subscriber needs to keep an email address that
was registered with a previous access provider. A 1GHz bare-bones
computer sells today for about $700. Assuming a two-year depreciation
(or a new impulse to buy a new computer), we compare $700
spent for a computer with $960 for ADSL, or worse, with all
the problems tacked on, to $2,400.
Leaving
aside the reasons for the high cost of connectivity and server
storage, let's concentrate instead on using the new gifts
of processor performance. They should help reduce, as much
as possible, the need for bandwidth and the time spent in
searches. The compression of voice and music, still images,
and video has always been dependent on the throughput capabilities
of the encoding and decoding processors. The lower the throughput
expected at the decoding end, the more bandwidth required
for the communication itself, helping connectivity and storage
costs soar upward. With more decompression capability, we
should expect a reduction in needed bandwidth, using known
methods. More may be done to reduce bandwidth: aside from
compression that reduces sound frequency or image sharpness,
psychological effects that help compress voice and music may
be able to make further use of performance and may be extended
into video.
The
new performance capabilities should also help reduce the time
users spend searching for relevant information-a problem largely
ignored until now. Search engines, rich in storage of databases,
are forcing Internet users to ask them questions in baby talk.
Worse, these engines are coming up with answers that most
of the time are irrelevant to the real search; some of them
are not even willing to prioritize by date or "relevance"
the order in which they provide answers or support searches
within subsets of searches.
Other
search engines will let you "AND" two or three words
but then give you (for good measure?) all the text they can
find that contains any one of the words. How often do we get
a response that reads "24,560 documents found, displaying
the first 10?" It seems like a long time ago that there
were a few programs a user could buy to help poll several
search engines. But the programs were not much more customizable
than the search engines on the Web and quickly succumbed to
the "ask" and "mamma" type of engines.
The world was too busy making quick money by creating complex,
animation- and video-loaded, time-consuming, beautiful but
hard-to-read pages and Web sites. Many of these beautiful
new Web sites couldn't be found easily, because users had
only the tools offered by the popular search engines.
The
new gifts of processor performance may be able to help provide
quality media at lower connectivity demands. Additionally,
high processor performance can increase user productivity
in text and image searches, thus removing some of the barriers
that prevent increases in general-purpose computer use. They
may help create virtual private networks (VPN) and distributed
storage that will make communications and databases secure,
easy to update, and almost impossible to eradicate.
As Intel
and other semiconductor manufacturers take performance beyond
2GHz, they may want to encourage development of a new app
that will make the Internet experience more efficient and
less costly. And in the process, they may shift some of the
revenue back to themselves.
NEC
Processor Goes Out of Order
By Markus Levy {9/10/01-01}
NEC
has typically provided processors that have low to midrange
complexity, offering devices that range from tiny 4-bit microcontrollers
to high-end, yet conservative, 64- bit microprocessors. This
image may have changed, however, with the company's recent
Embedded Processor Forum introduction of its newly designed
VR5500 architecture. The most notable features of this superscalar
processor are its 10-stage pipelines combined with out-of-order
(OOO) execution and register renaming. The least notable feature
is NEC's releasing of the first VR5500-based device at only
300MHz in its 0.13-micron process, but there's more to good
performance than clock rate alone.
The
VR5500 is upward compatible with NEC's mature VR5432, allowing
customers to continue using tools, operating system, and software
based on the MIPS IV ISA. The VR5500 is built from the ground
up to be a scalable architecture and is loaded with plenty
of headroom to boost the operating frequency over time. Don't
be fooled by the company's initial 300MHz device; NEC is taking
a conservative approach to guarantee volume production for
the digital consumer market. (The full version of this article
is available online to Microprocessor Report subscribers at:
http://www.mdronline.com/mpr/h/2001/0910/153701.html)
Ripping
Good Audio Optimization
Hot Consumer App Leads Recovery Charge
By Cary D. Snyder {9/10/01-02}
There
is no denying the popularity of the Internet as a conduit
for disseminating digital music; look at how much publicity
Napster and the MP3 compressed audio format have received.
In-Stat market forecasts predict that between 10 million and
30 million flash-based digital music players will be sold
annually by the year 2004. In this market, audio-chip manufacturers
Cirrus Logic, Micronas GmbH, and Texas Instruments have taken
the lead in fueling the skyrocketing use of digital music
by providing silicon for digital music processing. These silicon
manufacturers are now developing third- and fourth-generation
processors for portable digital audio players. Cirrus has
the Maverick EP7409, Micronas has its new Zenon architecture,
and TI is busy working to bring the DA250 to the market-indicating
digital music is here to stay, with MP3 currently the most
popular digital audio compression algorithm.
Integrated
MP3 chips will do much to bring the retail price of flash-memory-based
players below $100 while doubling battery life-a winning combination.
The most important drivers for manufacturers of many portable
digital audio players are cost to manufacture and price to
the end user. To help meet OEM cost requirements, silicon
manufacturers are increasing integration in an attempt to
lower costs for player products. The implementation is complicated
by the need to have the same chips support full-featured,
higher- margin products.
Providers
of digital music processor chips offer a prime example of
the way intelligent integration leads to success-lower-cost
bills of materials, smaller players, longer battery life,
and a number of other feature improvements. An In-Stat/MDR
study (New Products and Technologies Gradually Gaining Acceptance,
www.instat.com/catalog/cat-mm.htm#mm0101mi) estimates the
declining average price a person would be willing to pay for
an MP3 player. From the information in this study, it is easy
to conclude that the market will experience a significant
increase in sales as the price of MP3 players goes below $100.
Additional information on the increasing popularity of digital
music is available in a related In- Stat/MDR report (Portable
Digital Music Players Ride the MP3 Wave:
http://www.instat.com/abstracts/mm/2000/mm0012da_abs.htm).
This
article examines three different approaches to creating silicon
for digital music players: Cirrus Logic's third-generation
EP7409, which combines a 74MHz ARM7TDMI with a companion 24-bit
DSP; TI's use of 55x DSP cores in its newest chip-the DA250;
and Micronas GmbH's new Zenon ARM-based processor architecture
and audio-processing companion chip. (The full version of
this article is available online to Microprocessor Report
subscribers at:
http://www.mdronline.com/mpr/h/2001/0910/153702.html).
Narrowed
I/O Options Part II
The PCI Successor Is 3GIO (Serial PCI)
By Cary D. Snyder {9/4/01-01}
Future
PC connection standards are clearer now. According to the
PCI Special Interest Group (PCI-SIG), the Intel-born 3GIO
is in the catbird seat as the heir-apparent replacement for
the ubiquitous PCI. Backers of HyperTransport and RapidIO
realize that 3GIO (or whatever moniker PCI-SIG chooses) will
be the narrow I/O bus replacement for PCI. The PCI-SIG general
membership is expected begin to review new PCI standard for
completeness and accuracy early next year.
The
real push for and acceptance of 3GIO will come from increased
bandwidth at the lowest interface-pin count. The initial 3GIO
specification's value of 100MB/s per pin translates into the
lowest cost-per-pin implementation option for a variety of
bandwidth requirements. The good thing about having the PCI
SIG develop and administer this specification is that current
members can work together to create a smooth transition. There
is no reason to rush this process, as current PCI/PCI-X solutions
fulfill today's bandwidth needs.
HyperTransport
and RapidIO will find their own niches in network communications
applications. What is most interesting about these standards
is that FPGA vendors Xilinx and Altera are leading ASIC vendors
in production release of physical-layer components for RapidIO
and HyperTransport.
Intel's
claim that the 3GIO specification has long-lasting attributes
is valid; its 10-plus years of expertise in developing and
driving successful I/O standards-PCI, AGP, USB, and InfiniBand-are
being put to good use. Intel's willingness to share its expertise
with the entire digital electronics industry should be applauded-not
lambasted as domineering control. This article examines the
technical fit, form, and function of narrowed I/O buses. (The
full version of this article is available online to Microprocessor
Report subscribers at:
http://www.mdronline.com/mpr/h/2001/0904/153601.html).
MIPS
Processor Hits 1GHz
PMC-Sierra Discusses Details at Embedded Processor Forum
By Markus Levy {8/27/01-02}
PMC-Sierra's
MIPS Processor Division, formerly known as QED, has a history
of developing high-performance MIPS processors, particularly
for high-end networking equipment and printers. At the Embedded
Processor Forum 2001, PMC- Sierra demonstrated the continuation
of its high- performance trend as it unveiled the details
of its double- headed RM9000x2, a dual-core device capable
of reaching speeds of 1GHz and having more than the average
number of high-speed buses use for moving data around. (The
full version of this article is available online to Microprocessor
Report subscribers at:
http://www.mdronline.com/mpr/h/2001/0827/153502.html).
Upcoming
Events of Interest:
Microprocessor
Forum 2001 News Flash
!!
MPF 2001 News Flash !!
Special Bonus for our Registered Conference Attendees:
Monday Night Welcome Party will feature Federico Faggin, co-founder
of Synaptics, who led the design and development of the world's
first microprocessor and more than 25 integrated circuits.
He was also inducted into the National's Inventor's Hall of
Fame for the co-invention of the microprocessor.
Movie
Night will be at the San Jose Tech Museum's IMAX theater on
Wednesday October 17, starting at 6:15, The movie will be
Shackleton's Antarctic Adventure. You won't want to miss all
the fun and surprises we have in store for you.
Due
to the overwhelming number of first time introductions planned
at this year conference, we have decided to begin the conference
one half day early. The conference will now begin on Monday
October 15th at The Fairmont Hotel in San Jose, CA.
Here
is what's happening:
- Tuesday's
schedule was so jam packed with 1st time introductions that
we had to add an extra half day to the conference.
- Conference
now set to begin on Monday October 15th at 1:00 PM.
- Register
before August 31st for the early bird discount.
This
is one event you will not want to miss, so register now while
you're thinking about it!
Complete
program details and fast on-line registration are available
now at
http://www.mdronline.com/mpf, or call us toll-free at
800.527.0288 or (480.483.4441 (AZ) outside North America).
|