Microprocessor
Watch
Issue #16
MicroDesign Resources --- September 15, 1999
Editor:
Michael Slater
Contributors: Linley Gwennap, Keith Diefendorff, Peter Glaskowsky
In
This Issue:
- Rapid
Pentium III Price Cuts Continue
- S3
Preps Savage2000 for New Millennium
- Nvidia
GeForce 256 Adds Geometry Acceleration
- MoSys
Explains 1T-SRAM Technology
- Editorial:
Via Shopping Spree Reshapes x86 Market
Microprocessor
Forum is less than three weeks away! Check out the updated
agenda and register today at http://www.MDRonline.com/mpf.
Don't miss Intel's disclosure of the Merced microarchitecture,
details on Coppermine, AMD's Athlon for servers, Via's new
x86 plans, the first single-chip information appliance, a
radical new programmable chip for multimedia and networking,
new DSPs, and much more!
Rapid
Pentium III Price Cuts Continue
On 9/12,
Intel cut Pentium III prices for the third time in three months.
At $615, the Pentium III-600 is now 25% less expensive than
at its July introduction. The price of a Pentium III-500 has
fallen 41% in the same period. Prices will probably fall further
when the 0.18-micron Pentium III (aka Coppermine) is introduced
next month. Intel has indicated that Coppermine will debut
at speeds of at least 700 MHz.
The company
also cut the prices of its other processors. Celeron prices
were trimmed by 8% to 15% from the August pricing; no new
products are expected in this segment until next year. Mobile
prices, which had not been cut since June, dropped by 30%
to 40% in preparation for the Mobile Coppermine introduction
next month. --L.G.
S3
Preps Savage2000 for New Millennium
With its
announcement of the Savage2000, the first mainstream 3D chip
with an integrated geometry engine, S3 has regained the position
of technology leadership it lost in the industry transition
to 3D graphics. The rendering engine on the faster Savage2000+
variant can draw two pixels per clock at 200 MHz, with one
or two bilinear-filtered textures per pixel. The chip's 400-Mpixel/s
dual-textured throughput is better than that of Nvidia's competing
GeForce 256 (see below), but the Nvidia chip is faster in
other modes.
S3 (http://www.s3.com)
plans to sell the Savage2000 for just $29, while the Savage2000+
will list for $35. These prices are meaningful for only a
few board makers, such as Number Nine, that use these chips
in niche markets. S3's purchase of mainstream board vendor
Diamond Multimedia means that the Savage2000 will not be offered
to direct competitors. --P.N.G.
Nvidia
GeForce 256 Adds Geometry Acceleration
Close
on the heels of S3's Savage2000 comes Nvidia's own geometry-accelerated
PC graphics chip, the GeForce 256. Fewer details are available
about the Nvidia product, but it looks to have rendering performance
comparable to that of the Savage2000. Nvidia says the slowest
speed grade of the GeForce 256 will run at 120 MHz and issue
up to four pixels per clock for a pixel-fill rate of 480 Mpixels/s.
The company has yet to determine the maximum speed of the
new design.
As its
name implies, the GeForce 256 includes a 256-bit rendering
engine. This engine is coupled to a 128-bit local-memory controller
that supports up to 128M of DDR SDRAM (vs. 64M of SGRAM on
the Savage2000). The 23-million-transistor chip is being built
in a 0.22-micron five-layer-metal process. Nvidia (http://www.nvidia.com)
has not announced pricing or availability for the GeForce
256, but we estimate the chip price is as much as $50 for
the fastest versions. Boards should be available for the Christmas
buying season. Nvidia also announced deals with six board
vendors and five major PC OEMs, showing that the new chip
is already a major force in the industry. --P.N.G.
MoSys
Explains 1T-SRAM Technology
For the
first time, MoSys has offered a complete explanation of the
operation of its unique 1T-SRAM technology (see MPR 8/3/98,
p. 9), used in chips from MoSys or as a core that can be integrated
into ASICs from various foundries. The 1T-SRAM can be made
in pure logic processes for higher speed, or with an embedded
DRAM process to achieve greater density.
Though
MoSys (http://www.mosys.com)
calls the design an SRAM, it is based on single-transistor
DRAM cells. As with any other DRAM, the data in these cells
must be periodically refreshed to prevent data loss. What
makes the 1T-SRAM unique is that it offers a true SRAM-style
interface that hides all refresh operations from the memory
controller.
This
goal is achieved by a combination of a high-speed core and
a unique on-chip cache. All necessary refresh operations can
be performed in parallel with external accesses that are handled
by the cache.
Perhaps
the most valuable design win the 1T-SRAM will ever see was
revealed recently when Nintendo announced it will use the
MoSys design in the Flipper graphics chip for its forthcoming
Dolphin video-game console (see MPR 5/31/99, p. 5), due out
late next year. Nintendo expects to sell millions of the Dolphin
consoles, making it a lucrative customer for MoSys.
Analog
Devices, NEC, and TSMC have taken 1T-SRAM foundry licenses.
MoSys says it has taped out 20 different 1T-SRAM designs at
these and other foundries and expects additional announcements
this year. These deals, and the Nintendo win, should give
1T-SRAM a bright future. --P.N.G.
Editorial:
Via Shopping Spree Reshapes x86 Market
Via Technologies
has made a bold entry into the x86 processor market by acquiring
both Cyrix and IDT's Centaur group. This unusual tactic raises
questions about how the Taiwanese company will combine the
two design teams and two product lines. If Via plays its cards
well, however, it could be a potent competitor for Intel and
AMD in the low end of the PC processor market.
The first
question is why Via bought both companies instead of just
one. When Cyrix went up for sale, it looked like a better
deal than Centaur, with a larger market share and a more powerful
processor core. But upon further analysis, the advantages
of Centaur's technology became clear.
Centaur's
forthcoming WinChip 4 core has half as many transistors as
Cyrix's next-generation Jalapeno core, making it much less
expensive to build (see MPR 8/2/99, p. 1). In a 0.18-micron
process, WinChip 4 will also dissipate less power than Jalapeno
and is likely to achieve a higher clock speed, a metric that
is more important than raw performance in the low-end PC market.
Furthermore, Centaur's lean 60-person design team fit into
Via's revenue projections much better than Cyrix's bloated
staff of 330.
Sources
indicate that Via was initially willing to pay as much as
$300 million, or about one times annual revenue, for Cyrix.
But once Via got a good look, it decided to acquire Centaur
while renegotiating the Cyrix price down to $167 million,
with much of that price dependent on future Cyrix revenues
that may not be achieved. This reduction is probably more
than enough to cover the cost of buying Centaur. The pair
of purchases lets Via pick and combine the best assets of
each.
Which
assets will Via choose? Given the superior characteristics
of the WinChip 4 core and its efficient design team, all indications
are that Via will focus on that core in the future while discarding
most of the Cyrix designers. Cyrix is ahead of Centaur in
developing an Intel-compatible Socket 370 interface, however,
so Via may keep some of the Cyrix team to graft that interface
onto the WinChip 4 core.
Via may
also choose to market future WinChips under the Cyrix brand,
which has more recognition than WinChip, particularly in the
U.S. market. In fact, Via could market the current WinChips
under the M II brand, since they are plug-compatible with
the current M II and could be PR-rated to deliver the same
performance.
In the
low end of the market, Intel has effectively used Celeron
price cuts as a club to beat its competitors senseless. I
believe the only way for a competitor to survive in this segment
is to match both Celeron's clock speed and its socket with
a lower-cost product. Matching the socket is necessary, because
there isn't enough profit in this segment to support a non-Intel
infrastructure. Competitors must have a lower manufacturing
cost to generate profits from their lower prices and lower
volumes.
If Via
produces a 0.18-micron Socket 370 version of WinChip 4, it
could follow this path to success. Centaur's compact core
will cost less to build than Celeron. With a Socket 370 interface,
Via can ride Intel's coattails into standard PC motherboards.
As Via
pursues this strategy, its enemy is not just Intel but AMD.
That vendor's K6 parts are a big seller in the Celeron space,
and AMD plans to push its new Athlon processor into the low
end next year. Although Via has been working on a Slot A chip
set for Athlon, I doubt that chip set will see the light of
day, given the company's new strategy. Why build chip sets
that support only your enemy? With Via and Intel controlling
more than 90% of the chip-set market, that leaves only a few
also-rans (and AMD itself) likely to support Slot A.
The final
question concerns patent rights. Via will use National to
fab at least some of its processors, but sources indicate
that National's patent license with Intel does not extend
to third- party products. IBM is an Intel-licensed foundry,
but Via would rather shift production to lower-cost Taiwanese
fabs. Intel has already sued Via over chip-set patents, and
a suit blocking Via from selling unlicensed processors appears
inevitable.
The Cyrix
purchase includes some patents, and Via may hope to build
a patent portfolio strong enough to launch an effective countersuit
against Intel. Alternatively, the company could try to market
its chips only in Asian countries with weak patent laws, but
that would greatly limit the potential market.
If the
company can overcome its patent problems, it has all the tools
necessary to successfully develop and market low-cost PC processors:
an efficient design team, a low-cost CPU core, a Socket 370
interface, and a base of previous customers totaling 5% of
the market. As AMD's poor example shows, strong execution
is also required to successfully compete against Intel, so
we must wait to see if Via can effectively use its new tools.
--L.G.
LATE
ADDITION TO MICROPROCESSOR FORUM AGENDA: Via will present
new information about its microprocessor plans. Register today
at http://www.MDRonline.com/mpf.
|